Need advice on divorce and mediation?

If you need advice on your options on #divorce and how #mediation can help please contact us #familylaw

http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/page/family-disputes/102/

Check out our January e-newsletter!

Email us at hello@nataliegambleassociates to subscribe

http://email.lovejiffymail.com/t/r-B6F1AFEDF6297F032540EF23F30FEDED?fb_action_ids=10153754972120354&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%5B582997595103317%5D&action_type_map=%5B%22og.likes%22%5D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D …

Autumn Public Speaking

We've been doing lots of public speaking this autumn - find out more about what we've been saying at http://www.nataliegambleassociates.co.uk/blog/2013/12/06/ngas-autumn-of-public-speaking/ …

Equal Marriage (of sorts) - Gay Marriage becomes legal in England and Wales

Following our blog earlier in the year where we reported on the progress of the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill we are delighted that the Bill has now received royal assent. After much debate and somewhat of a furore, this means that same sex marriage is now law, even though the first UK same sex marriages won’t take place until Spring 2014 once all the procedures and paperwork have been put in place.
Perhaps unsurprisingly there is some confusion around what the changes in the law actually mean. The key points to note are as follows:
1. It will be legal for couples of the same sex to marry in England in Wales.
2. Same sex couples can have a civil or religious wedding, but can only have a religious wedding if the relevant religious group decides to ‘opt in’ (which every religious group except the Church of England can do).
3. Civil partnership will remain an option for same sex, but not heterosexual, couples. (The legal differences between marriage and civil partnership are minimal in practice).
4. Same sex couples already in a civil partnership can convert their civil partnership into a marriage if it was registered in England and Wales. This will not apply to couples who registered a civil partnership in Northern Ireland, Scotland or abroad (who will not be able to marry unless they dissolve their civil partnership first).
5. For those splitting up, adultery is not a ground for dissolving a civil partnership and is only a ground for dissolving a same sex marriage if the adultery takes place with a member of the opposite sex (although in practice unreasonable behaviour usually gives grounds for dissolving a relationship where there has been infidelity anyway).
6. There is no international harmonisation of how or if a same sex marriage will be recognised in other countries. However, it is likely that a same sex marriage will be recognised in countries where same sex marriage is legal (such as France which has recently undergone similar changes).
The change in the law is certainly welcomed by us at NGA but the rules are undoubtedly complex. There has already been controversy over the decision to allow religious groups to opt in but this doesn’t apply to the Church of England. It seems an awkward concept that same sex couples are to be able to enter into a civil partnership but for there to be no option for heterosexual couples to do likewise.
There will be complex questions from couples in England and Wales who have married or registered a civil partnership abroad as to how their relationship will be recognised in England and Wales. Similarly, relocating couples will need to know whether their marriage will be recognised abroad. This will impact on issues such as tax planning or the breakdown of the relationship.
Much like with our campaigning work for a global harmonisation of surrogacy laws we feel that a more universal approach to same sex marriage is needed, but this is herculean task at a global level. In the meantime, UK same sex marriage is a huge step in the right direction.
Here at NGA we specialise in helping alternative families and have a strong background in cases involving the breakdown of relationships. We help with civil partnership dissolution, divorce and disputes relating to children and financial matters. We also help with pre registration and pre nuptial agreements to give clarity and prevent disputes in the future. If you would like to discuss your circumstances with us please contact Richard Perrins for more information.
Family Disputes Pre Nuptial Agreements Divorce and Civil Partnership Dissolution Financial matters

High Court judge warns 'loud and clear': international parents need a UK court order

In a High Court ruling published today, Mrs Justice Theis has issued a public warning to parents of children born through international surrogacy that they must apply to court in the UK.

She said: “The legal relationship between children born as a result of surrogacy arrangements and their intended parents is not on a secure legal footing without [a UK parental order] being made. That can have long term legal consequences for the children… The message needs to go out loud and clear to encourage parental order applications to be made in respect of children born as a result of international surrogacy agreements, and for them to be made promptly.”

Mrs Justice Theis was granting parenthood to a gay couple (civil partners) who had conceived twins through surrogacy in California. She said: “I am entirely satisfied the applicants have acted in good faith at all stages. Their journey to have a family has clearly been a long and arduous one, both emotionally and financially. They are a loving and committed same sex couple with a stable home environment.”

The judge published her decision to send a message that British parents through surrogacy must, like this couple, deal with UK law properly. As we well know at NGA, increasing numbers of prospective parents are travelling to places like California where professional surrogacy agencies manage the process (unlike in the UK, where it is a criminal offence for third parties to broker surrogacy arrangements for profit). California offers legally binding surrogacy contracts and a birth certificate naming the intended parents. But UK law does not recognise Californian law, instead treating the surrogate and her husband as the parents no matter what the US birth certificate says. The British parents then need a parental order from the UK family court to become the legal parents in the UK.

Without it, they have no right to make decisions as parents and may be caring for their child illegally. Their child may lack basic legal rights to inheritance, child support and British nationality. If the parents do not apply to court within six months of the birth, they lose the chance of getting a UK birth certificate forever. It is not known how many UK parents may already be in this position.

In this case, the parents had followed UK legal procedures properly and the court made a parental order in their favour. The surrogate – in accordance with Californian law – had been paid $56,750 plus expenses. Payments for surrogacy are not illegal under UK law, but if more than ‘reasonable expenses’ is paid the court has to weigh things up carefully before making a parental order. This is not the first time the High Court has ‘authorised’ a commercial payment to a foreign surrogate, although the amount in this case was larger than in any previous case. It is lawful to pay a surrogate an inconvenience fee in California. Payments are usually lower ($25,000 to $30,000 being typical) which is in practice often not much more than the £10,000 to £15,000 commonly paid to UK surrogates. As the judge explained, the payment in this case was exceptional because the parents, following a difficult fertility journey, had selected an experienced surrogate. She subsequently carried twins and gave birth by caesarean. The judge, having assessed the facts carefully, was satisfied that the surrogate was a “mature woman with financial means. She had legal advice before entering into the agreement and was able to command a higher compensation fee because of her proven track record”. Making an order was therefore not an affront to public policy and was justified because it ensured the children’s lifelong security.

Natalie Gamble, solicitor for the parents, comments: “Surrogacy law in the UK desperately needs to be updated to deal with the realities of the global fertility market. Our current law was written more than 20 years ago before any of these scenarios were dreamt of, and there is no logical fit between the law here and the law abroad. It is easy for parents to overlook the need to deal with UK law as well as US law, and if they do, the legal status of their children may be permanently compromised. The court is rightly very worried about that. All parents planning international surrogacy arrangements need the right information about the law, and they need it in time.”

NGA at the G3 awards celebrating gay and lesbian achievement

Natalie and Richard were at the G3 awards on Friday night, a gala evening hosted by Charlie Condou and Sophie Ward, celebrating leading figures and influencers in the LGBT world.

NGA was proud to be nominated for not just one but two of the prestigious awards – Family Provider of the Year, and Diversity Champion of the Year – at an event attended by guests including Stephen Fry, Clare Balding, Peter Tatchell and Ben Summerskill.

Here’s what G3 said about us:

Natalie Gamble Associates is known for its pioneering work pushing the boundaries of the law for same sex parents. The team has helped thousands of alternative families, including acting in the groundbreaking cases which have made UK law on donor conception and international surrogacy. NGA campaigns on behalf of alternative families, successfully defending the right for same sex parents to be named on birth certificates together back in 2008, and recently winning a long campaign to give gay dads through surrogacy equal maternity leave rights.

Find out more about our work with same sex parents or about our team, or contact us for help or advice.

HFEA to update surrogacy guidance to UK clinics

The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has voted to update the guidance it gives to UK fertility clinics on surrogacy. The new Code of Practice will:

• clarify what UK clinics should say to surrogacy patients, and
• update clinic procedures and forms for surrogacy.

The HFEA voted to make these changes (following advice from NGA and its own lawyers) at its meeting on 20 March 2013 and will now undergo a period of consultation on the practicalities, before the new Code of Practice is introduced on 1 October 2013. This includes a workshop for clinics and professionals practising in surrogacy, to be held at the HFEA on 30 April 2013.

We congratulate the HFEA on a very sensible decision, which will mean clearer guidance for parents and clinics dealing with increasing numbers of surrogacy cases. In particular, it will be made clear that where a surrogate is unmarried, one of the intended parents (whether gay or straight, and whether or not biologically parent) can be named on the child's initial birth certificate together with the surrogate.This approach will make the HFEA's guidance entirely consistent with longstanding practice at register offices and in the family courts.

You can find out more about the HFEA meeting on 20 March here, and there is more on our website about surrogacy law. 

Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill

Here at NGA we are keeping a close eye on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill and its progress through Parliament. The Bill has attracted much public interest this year after passing its second reading in the House of Commons on 5 February 2013 (with a majority of 400 to 175) and now having passed the committee stage on 12 March 2013. This blog is the first of a series as we track the passage of the Bill and the impact it may have.

What does the Bill do?

If passed, the Bill will finally give same sex partners in England and Wales the right to marry. It is currently unlawful in the UK for gay and lesbian couples to legally marry although since 2005 same sex couples have been able to enter into a civil partnership, which gives equivalent legal rights without the badge of ‘marriage’. The new legislation will not only enable same sex couples to marry but also, if they choose, to convert their existing civil partnership into a marriage.

At NGA we have long campaigned for equal rights for same sex couples and we welcome the upcoming changes. Whilst the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act in 2004 was hugely significant, it is not right to draw a distinction between marriage for straight couples and civil partnership for same sex couples. ’Separate but equal’ is a discriminatory approach in principle, in just the same way US racial segregation was in the 1950s.

Civil partners vs spouses: will it make a difference?

We help alternative families in a number of ways at NGA and are interested to see how the upcoming changes may affect same sex couples, in particular couples involved in a relationship breakdown.

Following the introduction of the Civil Partnership Act 2004 couples have been able to bring their civil partnership to an end by petitioning to the court for a Civil Partnership dissolution. If the Bill is passed, same sex couples who have married or converted their civil partnership into a marriage will be able to get divorced, like married heterosexual couples. In practical terms this may make little difference as the way the court deals with untangling things is likely to be broadly the same. One quirk of the rules (which will continue) is that is the petitioning party (the partner bringing the divorce proceedings) will not be able to allege adultery unless his or her partner had committed adultery with a member of the opposite sex. However, the other grounds for heterosexual divorce – unreasonable behaviour, 2 years separation (with consent), 5 years separation and desertion – will also be available.

In respect of resolving the financial matters which arise out of relationship breakdown, it is not known yet what, if any, impact the change in the law will have. There is already little difference as currently the factors the court uses to determine financial matters under the Civil Partnership Act are identical to those used for married couples. This approach was tested and confirmed by the Court of Appeal last year in the case Lawrence v Gallagher (2012). The case involved a same sex couple who were asking the court to determine their financial situation. As this one was one of the first reported cases testing the Civil Partnership Act 2004 the court considered whether the approach should be different from that for divorce. The court confirmed the approach of the court would be the same due to the similarities in the wording in the two Acts, although recognised that every case would be fact-specific. It is highly likely therefore that the law will remain the same in this regard for same sex marriages when dealing with financial disputes.

However, even if the law is the same, same sex relationships less frequently involve the traditional constructs of straight marriages and this can have a big impact on how the finances are divided in practice. If there are children involved, there may also be challenging sensitivities as to unequal biological or legal parentage. Even if the ground-rules of the law seem the same, this means that getting advice from specialists can make an enormous difference. For more information on Civil Partnership breakdown, divorce and children matters you can find more here. At NGA we specialise in family disputes and are recognised as leading specialists in family law for same sex couples. For those who want more information about entering into a civil partnership or marriage we can assist with pre and post nuptial agreements.

It remains to be seen what affect the Bill will have from a legal perspective and we will be monitoring it closely but for now we are pleased to see the progress that has been made. It’s a big step in the right direction.

The NGA team is growing again

I am delighted to post two pieces of exciting news about the NGA family.

First, a big welcome to Richard Perrins, a solicitor who has joined our team this month as an experienced family lawyer. He will be supporting all aspects of our work, but with particular responsibility for our disputed cases, including relationship breakdown, finances and children disputes – a growing area of our work. Richard is a member of Resolution and specialises in private family law, including divorce, civil partnership dissolution, financial matters and disputes relating to children.

Massive congratulations also go to Nicola Scott, who has completed her professional training with us to qualify as a solicitor this month. We are always pleased to break new ground, and Nicola is the first solicitor in the UK to qualify into fertility law having trained in this specialist field. She has been an integral member of the team since 2009 and so already has significant experience in surrogacy, assisted reproduction and family law, and we are very proud that she is now a qualified member of the legal team.

If Richard or Nicola (or any of us) can be of any help, please do not hesitate to contact us.